•  
  • Welcome Guest!
  • |
  • Members Log In Close Panel
  •  
Home
 
  • Home
  • About us
  • Ethanol
  • Cogeneration
  • Environmental
  • Statistics
  • Distillery
  • Sugar Price
  • Sugar Process
  • Contact us

News


Centre, states spar over 3 key issues, eye April GST rollout
Date: 23 Sep 2016
Source: The Times of India
Reporter: TNN
News ID: 5992
Pdf:
Nlink:

New Delhi: It is likely to be a stormy Friday at Vigyan Bhawan where the Centre and the stateswill tackle at least three contentious issues even as they agreed to try and roll out goods and services tax from April.

Already, deciding the thresholdfor imposing GST is proving to be a tough task, given that states such as Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and those from the North East believe that keeping units with a turnoverof under Rs 25 lakh outside the cap will result in massive revenue loss. For the north eastern states, this threshold would mean that 80-85% of the units would be out of the tax net. Uttar Pradesh, which said that around 8% of the units would go out of the net, also argued for keeping the threshold at Rs 10 lakh.


"With regard to composition (scheme) we have finalised our proposal which has been unanimously accepted by the members. With regard to threshold for exemptions, there are two sets of suggestions which have come. We have converged those two different views... we will continue the meeting tomorrow and thereafter, so that we are able to converge to one particular figure as far as the exemptions are concerned," finance minister Arun Jaitley told reporters. The minister said that several issues such as the the timetable for rollout was agreed upon in the first meeting of GST Council on Thursday.

Revenue secretary Hasmukh Adhia said a consensus on compounding or composition scheme was reached which decided that traders with gross turnover of up to Rs 50 lakh will pay 1-2% tax. The scheme provides for an easier method of calculating the tax liability by allowing option for GST registration for dealers with turnover below the cut-off to opt for compounding and avoid the "normal track", which comes with more paperwork.

While the other two controversial issues — the compensation formula and the demand for state control over units with turnover are yet to be decided — will be discussed on Friday, state finance ministers indicated that there was a wide gap in the Centre and the states' stand. For instance, the finance ministry has proposed that the average revenue growth for the previous three years be taken to calculate the compensation formula. Ministers from Kerala and Tamil Nadu suggested that this may not be the best option and instead want the average for the best three out the last six years to be taken to calculate the average growth. This will result in the possibility of the Centre having to shell out higher compensation, something that it is not keen on, after promising to cover losses of the states for the first five years. A minister said a similar formula was adopted to pay compensation when state VAT was introduced over a decade ago.

On the issue of cross-empowerment, several states led by West Bengal want that units with turnover of up to Rs 1.5 crore to be under the exclusive domain of states for audit and collection purposes. Again, this is not acceptable to the Centre, which has argued that around 90% of the units in this segment would be service-based entities and the states are not equipped to tackle it. Besides, it has said that it would not be able to monitor these units.

Sources said that even some of the BJP states such as Gujarat want discussion on a few issues.              
 
  

Navigation

  • TV Interviews
  • Application Form For Associate Membership
  • Terms & Conditions (Associate Member)
  • ISMA President
  • Org. Structure
  • Associate Members(Regional Association)
  • Who Could be Member?
  • ISMA Committee
  • Past Presidents
  • New Developments
  • Publications
  • Acts & Orders
  • Landmark Cases
  • Forthcoming Events




Indian Sugar Mills Association (ISMA) © 2010 Privacy policy
Legal Terms & Disclaimer
 Maintained by