Welcome Guest!
|
Members Log In
Close Panel
Home
About us
Ethanol
Cogeneration
Environmental
Statistics
Distillery
Sugar Price
Sugar Process
Contact us
News
Rangarajan's pill
Date:
23 Jul 2016
Source:
The Financial Chronicle
Reporter:
Directorate of Sugarcane Development
News ID:
5785
Pdf:
Nlink:
Panel headed by ex-chair of PMEAC made several suggestions to help the ailing sugar sector
Several panels have been constituted in the past to suggest measures for the sugar sector. The last one was headed by C Rangarajan, chairman of former prime minister Manmohan Singh’s economic advisory council (PMEAC), which submitted its report in October 2012.
One of its major recommendations relates to revising the existing arrangement for the price to be paid to sugarcane farmers. The committee proposed that at the time of cane supply, mills should pay farmers a fair and remunerative price (FRP) determined by the Union government.
Subsequently, the state governments would announce any extra payment over and above FRP on a half-yearly basis.
This would be 70 per cent of the ex-mill prices of sugar and its byproducts against the quantity of cane supplied by each of them.
Based on the share so computed, additional payment, net of FRP already paid, would then be made to the farmer. Since the sugar value estimate includes return on capital employed, it implies that farmers would also get a share of the profits. With such a system in operation, the state governments were also advised not to declare their own state advised price (SAP).
The committee further recommended that the levy obligation for sourcing PDS sugar at less than market price should be dismantled. Instead, the state governments should be allowed to fix the issue price of PDS sugar and the Centre should compensate the state governments for the difference between the PDS price and the market price. The committee felt that regulated release of stocks in the open market imposed additional costs on factories on account of inventory accumulation.
This would free the industry from the burden of a government-welfare programme and indirectly benefit both the farmers and the consumers.
The committee also recommended that cane-growing areas should not be reserved for individual mills and instead sugar manufacturers should be allowed to enter into contract farming arrangements with cane growers. It also suggested doing away with the stipulation of minimum distance between two mills.
This would help create a competitive market for assured supply of cane, in the interest of farmers and economic efficiency.
However, where states were keen to continue with cane area reservation policy, the same should be allowed for at least three to five years at a time.
The panel favoured a stable policy regime with modest tariff levels of 5 per cent to 10 per cent ordinarily and dispensing with outright bans and quantitative restrictions. The committee also recommended dispensing with the mandatory requirement of jute packaging.
In respect of molasses, the committee favoured free movement and dismantling of end-use based allocation quotas that are in vogue in several states, to enable creation of a national market and better prices for this valuable byproduct as well as improved efficiency in its use.
(Source: Directorate of sugarcane development)
Navigation
TV Interviews
Application Form For Associate Membership
Terms & Conditions (Associate Member)
ISMA President
Org. Structure
Associate Members(Regional Association)
Who Could be Member?
ISMA Committee
Past Presidents
New Developments
Publications
Acts & Orders
Landmark Cases
Forthcoming Events